Remember AESA radar has a great ability that is constantly jumping frequency / LPI it allows the ability to hide, hard to detect by enemy RWR. However, R-27EM, AIM-7F may have a better performance with less maneuverable targets as F-35, A-10, Su-25 or high mobility such as F-16/15, FA-18EF, Su-27/30, J-10/11, Typhoon, Rafale, Jas 39 if combined with an AESA radar as the aN / APG-63 (V) 3 (F-15C) or Zhuk-AE (MiG -35). Thus, the smaller the target RCS as F-16E, MiG-21, F-22 missiles ARH very difficult to be effective, because the detection range of the missile seeker head will fit into the range of EW / ECM of enemy fighters In fact the seeker head AIM-120C WGU-44 / B-band operation in the I-band, it can be trapped/jamming by the SPS-171 / L005S Sorbtsiya-S H / I band ECM. It is an open question whether the AIM-120D when challenged with a modern DRFM (Digital RF Memory) based monopulse trackbreaking jammer will be able to significantly exceed the 50 percent order of magnitude kill probability of prior combat launches, let alone replicate the 85 percent performance achieved in ideal test range conditions Against such "soft" targets the AIM-120 has displayed a kill probability of less than 50 percent The important parameter is that every single target was not equipped with a modern defensive electronic warfare package and therefore not representative of a state-of-the-art Flanker in a modern BVR engagement. Combat statistics for all three variants are less stellar, amounting to, according to US sources, ten kills (including a friendly fire incident against a UH-60) of which six were genuine BVR shots, for the expenditure of just over a dozen AIM-120 rounds. Test range trials have resulted in stated kill probabilities of 85 percent out of 214 launches for the AIM-120C variant. The performance of the AIM-120A/B/C models in combat to date has not been spectacular. 5th 1999 MIG 25&source=bl&ots=OQuEM1q5yO&sig=xxwHAHql0IrYUsOYsQEbr4uFQC0&hl=vi&sa=X&ei=cn6nVNe0DsTioAS9moCYAQ&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false The violating MiG-25s escaped to fight another day Despite the Phoenix being the most expensive-and supposedly most capable-air-to-air radar-guided missile ever made, both missed. Subsequently, two Navy F-14s fired two AIM-54 Phoenix missiles at the two MiG-25s. xxiv The F-15s responded by firing three AIM-7 Sparrows and one AIM-120 AMRAAM. However AIM-120 is relatively poor as against the targeted poor mobility or even no RWR, ECM as the MiG-25, MiG-29B (in Yugoslavia and Iraq)Ī more recent Operation Southern Watch engagement occurred on January 5 th, 1999 when two Iraqi MiG-25s violating the southern “no-fly” zone illuminated two F- 15Cs with their BVR radar. However, we only need to look at the battle of AIM-120 and AIM-7, R-27, the two AIM-7 and R-27 (SARH) are effective against the target maneuverability such as the MiG-21, MiG-29. Homing head lock-on range to target with RCS 5 m2, 20 kmĪnyone with information seeker head (WGU-44/B) of the AIM-120C (and R-77 head seeker) against specific RCS ? Read This: Launch distance (with R-27 type missile at target with RCS (Radar Cross Section) 5 m2), 70 km Semi active radar homing vs active radar homing
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |